Sunday, August 21, 2011

From the Desk of the Chaplain: Contrition

From this week's letter to members of the Confraternity of St. Peter by Fr. J. Fryar FSSP:

Leaving the pharisee to his acts of pride in the Gospel today, let us rather consider the contrition of the publican.

There are two kinds of contrition. Perfect contrition and imperfect contrition. Both are good, even if one of the names has a negative connotation.

Imperfect contrition is the easier of the two, and the more common of the two. It is when we express our sorrow for our sins, but what motivates that sorrow is the fear of punishment.

When the repentant soul has perfect contrition, she does not concern herself as much with whether she will be punished or not. She is motivated by her love of God, and the fact that she has offended the person she loves. Perfect contrition carries with it the intention to confess your sins at the soonest possible convenience, and a firm purpose of amendment.

The Divine Justice is moved to forgive our venial sins when we repent with at least an imperfect act of contrition. When we go to confession, all our sins, both venial and mortal, and all our past sins are forgiven, and imperfect contrition suffices to receive the absolution.

However if we are in a situation when we cannot go to confession, the Divine Justice has deigned to forgive our mortal sins if we make a perfect act of contrition.

We should always strive to make every act of contrition perfect. If we wait until we see the truck crushing the hood of our car, more than likely our fate will motivate us to make an imperfect act of contrition at best. But our well being makes a sorry excuse for repentance. Our sins have offended Our Divine Master and Redeemer. We should be moved to sorrow because we have offended the One Who loves us, rather than letting ourselves and our fate be the motive for our contrition.

Praying for you,
Rev. Fr. J. Fryar FSSP
English-speaking Chaplain of the CSP

(Image above is St. Mary Magdalene by Carlo Dolci, 1670)

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

A Prayer for England

As the politics of the welfare state mentality and the immorality of secularism plays out in England, this prayer seems ever more urgent.

Holy Cross, Leicester, Courtesy Joseph Shaw

Monday, August 8, 2011

August 9, 1945: the day the Catholic Capital of Japan was leveled

Let love be without dissimulation. Hating that which is evil, cleaving to that which is good.
Romans, 12. 9

In writing this post I'm not embarking upon some cynical criticism of the ideals espoused by citizens of the United States of America, nor upon the humanistic virtues of the most powerful country of the modern era, and arguably one of the greatest of all history. I'm writing this post because, as a citizen of this same country, I'm obligated to uphold its laws and act in her best interests and for her greater good. This nation's greater good, as for all nations, is that she be converted, specifically by recognizing the absolute sovereignty of Jesus Christ.

Of course, the United States of America does not, and never has recognized Christ as sovereign. The Tea Party movement often speaks of "American exceptionalism", but for us Catholics with a sense of history, and a knowledge of a two thousand year-old heritage of far greater worth, the idea of this "exceptionalism" seems a bit childish, at best. At worst, it is a willful ignorance that can only end in an isolated nativism and mass xenophobia, which entrenches, rather than corrects, the deficiencies of our nation. Traditional Catholics can not afford to take part in that kind of project because it is our obligation, by baptism, to announce that Christ is Lord of all creation, even this present society and these present governments.

While often exaggerated, it is still true that the influence of freemasonry succeeded in reducing our government to rank indifferentism from the very beginning. This has had repercussions, and these are extremely serious given the power that the United States wields in the modern world. This is a nation capable of great good, but, unfortunately, also capable of great evil. In fact, one of the greatest evils ever committed by a nation was committed by the United States of America.

This post is offered as an invitation for an examination of conscience, lest we forget the evils for which our nation was responsible, and the course our nation can still traverse in the future. It invites us to investigate all aspects of our American society, for if our leaders and men of power were capable of this act, how much more are they capable of today? It invites us to examine our economic system now completely built upon an edifice of immoral usury, our treatment of the immigrant, our treatment of the aged and the poor and children, and finally, and most importantly, those laws and policies that allow for the slaughter of countless innocent, unborn children in their mother's womb. A pro-life position that isn't firmly based on Catholic moral and social principles, which by their nature encompass the whole spectrum of human life, is bound for failure. Only the true religion can offer a true remedy for the ills of our society, a remedy applied one soul at a time.

This is what makes the destruction of the "Catholic Capital of Japan" so poignant. The devil knows that only the true religion can offer true solutions, and, therefore, he seeks to destroy it.

Three days ago marked the anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing, which made the United States of America the first country to use a nuclear devise on a civilian population. Today marks the anniversary of the Nagasaki bombing, which made the United States of America the last country to date to use a nuclear devise on a civilian population. No matter how you slice the patriotic pie, these anniversaries mark the fact that this nation and her leaders were responsible for mass murder, wanton destruction, and the infliction of sustained and horrific pain on countless people. No matter how lofty our humanistic ideals, this historical fact can never be blotted out.

In those days Nagasaki was known as the "Catholic Capital of Japan" because two-thirds of Japan's Catholics lived in this city. President Harry S. Truman was a committed and serious mason. But speculation as to a connection is beside the point. Truman wasn't the only person responsible for choosing the targets of these dark deeds. Religious bigotry and polemics may have played a role in the selection of Nagasaki, but in the end it was ultimately Satan who inspired the choice. It was his attempt to blot out the true religion.

What of the nature of the attack, itself? What of the callous, heartless man who could condemn so many men, women and children to such a hellish death? What manner of darkness do we have before us? Is this the "American exceptionalism" that the Tea Party pundits insist we pass on to our children? I ask myself what I would say to that murdering, filthy, masonic, anti-Catholic sociopath who ordered this attack. I really don't know. Such evil leaves me speechless. However, I do know what I would say to those walk around with the expression "American exceptionalism" on their lips. Truman believed in that exceptionalism, and acted under its banner.

I realize the tragic significance of the atomic bomb... It is an awful responsibility which has come to us... We thank God that it has come to us, instead of to our enemies; and we pray that He may guide us to use it in His ways and for His purposes.

—President Harry S. Truman, Murderer

He said this after witnessing the destruction of Hiroshima, but before he preceded to destroy Nagasaki. He knew the significance. He saw the intelligence photographs, and yet he still committed the atrocity a second time. Is this the "American exceptionalism" that the Tea Party and its pundits so vaunt? Far from demonstrating the greatness of this nation, this exceptionalism, unfortunately, indicts her and her citizens.


What god do people like Truman pray to? Is it that "unknown" being of the masonic vows? We can be sure it is definitely not the Triune God as revealed by Jesus Christ! This is the god of the abortionist, and this god still reigns supreme in the hearts and minds of so many Americans who can snuff out the lives of thousands of babies a day, or stand by idly and allow it to happen. Don't think for a moment that Hiroshima and Nagasaki are now things of the past. The spirit of August 1945 is alive and well in the United States of America in abortion mills across our country.

And so I would say to those who banter the term "American exceptionalism": There's nothing exceptional about denying the sovereignty of Christ the King; the only thing that is exceptional about a social and private life that denies Christ is the exceptional degree of the meaningless misery, destruction, and death of the sin that inevitably fills that vacuum.

I'm sure some wag will ask, "what has this to do with traditional Catholicism?"

Well, dear sir, it has to do with knowing where we have been and recognizing where we are headed.

It's about the spiritual works of mercy (remember those?).

It's about avoiding being an accessory to another man's sin by silence or defense.

It's about offering a Mass for those who were murdered because of a perverse will for power.

It's about respecting, knowing, and then shaping policies based on the natural law and the just war theory, and not just paying those things lip service.

It's about making clear that this country needs to be converted to traditional Catholicism, making clear that our government must admit that it holds secular power by God's will and as His representative, and making clear that all Americans need to recognize the absolute sovereignty of Jesus Christ.

And these things are traditional enough for me on a day like today.

Sunday, August 7, 2011

A Clarion Call For Reform

Unhappy man that I am! Who will deliver me from the body of this death? The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. (Rom. 7, 24-25)

In the wake of the Standard and Poor’s historic downgrade of the sovereign credit rating of the United States of America, and the not so veiled threat that it could be downgraded again in six to twenty-four months, one thing at least should be crystal clear: real changes have to be made. This is a call for the United States government to set its house in order. Analogously, it is also a call for the people of this country, especially those who have been away from their Catholic faith, to set their houses in order as well.

The immediate effects of the downgrade will probably not be as catastrophic as the collapse of Lehman Brothers, mainly because this was not something that was wholly unexpected. However, it is a humiliating indication to the government of the United States that changes must be made. No longer can politicians and bureaucrats pander to their constituents by making facial attempts to fix the national debt problem. Now they are being judged by an objective standard other than the electorate they have made an art out of manipulating. The management of this nearly out-of-control debt will force the government to make tough decisions, which will in turn cause the citizenry to make tough decisions. I doubt that austerity measures like those in Greece are headed for Main Street, USA, but it’s reasonable to conclude that tough times are coming.

This may prove to be a good thing. Tough times have a tendency to prove the metal of a person and a people. As the present economic system continues to demonstrate its glaring flaws, as the system of usury-used-to-finance-distraction is revealed to be a flimsy edifice at best, perhaps people will be forced out of their television induced stupor long enough to take a moment to account for their way of life and the things they value. That alone would be nothing short of a miracle.

I don’t pretend to know what the future holds in store for the United States, but I’m by nature an optimist. It is my hope that calm and reasonable heads will prevail, and they will suggest solutions that could cause a fundamental societal shift for the better. I hope we will see a shift in the coming years toward a distributionist economic system less dependent on mega-banks, usury and globalism. We could see the creation of an economy that generates real wealth by production, and not just mass production for unthinking consumption, but production of quality goods that are fitting for quality people. It is my hope that a healthy localism based on the model of subsidiarity will be encouraged by governments, and thereby families and communities will be strengthened and the corrosive nature of mobilism will be minimized. This may be an overly rosy picture, I admit. But like I said, I’m an optimist by nature.

And there is precedent for being hopeful. While there are many tales of personal financial woe, there are just as many tales of personal financial success. Countless Americans have sunk themselves so far in debt that recovery seemed all but impossible. However, many decided to dig in their heels and do what it would take to rise out of the debt trap. There are people who suffered through very hard times to erase thousands, even hundreds of thousands, of dollars in debt. If you speak with these people they will all tell you the same basic story: it is about overcoming and changing a corrosive, destructive lifestyle. There’s no reason to believe that as a nation a similar transformation can’t take place if citizens like you and I insist that we as a nation dig in our heels and change those policies and societal aspects that have gotten us into the mess that we now find ourselves.

Of course, there’s no guarantee that Americans will have the intestinal fortitude to see this thing through, but usually given the choice between annihilation and survival, man leans toward survival. We just have to be given a clear a vision of the true alternatives free of the distractions that cloud our vision. Today’s present economic jolt from S&P perhaps has provided a clear vision for our nation and our personal lives.

Certainly we’ve all experienced in our personal lives a similar jolt, which has given us a momentary clear vision of our lives and our purpose on this earth. Perhaps a sermon, a book, or some other reminder jars us out of our daily routine and forces us to make an account for how we are living our lives and what we value. These moments are a foreshadowing of that last account we must render for ourselves before the judgment seat of God. Unfortunately, this shock happens to countless people who, when they make that accounting, perceive what seem insurmountable obstacles that hinder them from changing their lives to conform what they know to be God’s will. This, I suspect, is one of the major reasons, other than ignorance, that keeps fallen away Catholics from coming back to the faith.

Because our modern culture so long ago cast off God and religion as a sure guide to the forming of personal choices and lifestyles, many people who have fallen away from the Catholic faith have contaminated their lives with countless contradictions to the demands of the Gospel. These various disorders can appear to be impossibly daunting obstacles to setting one’s house in order and returning to the true faith. Modern man has gotten himself into a moral mess even worse than the debt mess in which the United States and so many individuals have gotten themselves. As it turns out the modern godless culture has produced angry and dissatisfied people. It can be seen in just about any busy mega-box-store parking lot, where people will actually fight and grow enraged over a parking place!

The materialism and hedonistic distractions of our modern world are proving ineffectual, as the present economic crisis reflects, as the lack of civility in our society reflects, and as reflected in how Americans live isolated in front of their television sets and lash out irrationally with little or no provocation. If there is any one indicator in our modern world of how irrationally angry people are, it is the phenomenon of road rage. The modern world has failed to provide the stability and happiness that everyone inherently desires. However, the average fallen away Catholic is so submerged under a kind of debt to worldliness that the long and hard ascent to a better life of faith seems impossibly arduous.

One of the greatest contributing factors to the despair often encountered by fallen away Catholics is the proliferation of divorce and remarriage in our society. In fact, the most common reason for falling away, I suspect, would be the presence of a moral impediment to practicing the faith, such as getting a divorce and remarrying. Of course, Our Blessed Lord laid down quite frankly a prohibition against divorce, and as a consequence our Catholic faith prohibits divorce and remarriage. Despite the detractors against the Church’s teaching in this regard, anyone who has read the Bible knows full well that divorce and remarriage was prohibited from the very beginning. St. Paul wrote in his first letter to the Corinthians:

But to them that are married, not I but the Lord commandeth, that the wife depart not from her husband. And if she depart, that she remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband. And let not the husband put away his wife. (1 Cor. 7. 10-11)


It doesn’t get any clearer than this! But if that’s not clear enough, there are still more passages (1 Cor 11. 27-30; Matt 16. 18-19; Mal 2. 16; Luke 16. 18; Mark 10. 11-12). However, this can be quite despairing for the individual that knows the Catholic Church is the true religion, but they are not only divorced and remarried, but divorced and remarried perhaps two or three times over. Such is the state of our post-Christian society, which is more polygamous than monogamous, that men and women have entered into multiple marriage contracts, and their current state of life makes the teachings of Christ regarding divorce, and their consequences for individuals, seem unbearable.

There are many liberal Catholics who, rightly, perceive the rigors entailed in divorced and remarried people attempting to reconcile their present lives with the demands of Our Blessed Lord, but seeing this struggle as insurmountable, they propose, wrongly, to water down the commands of Our Blessed Lord rather than calling people to struggle against the imperfections and disorders in their lives. They would like to see the Church change her teachings regarding divorce and remarriage to “lighten the load” for those who have divorced and remarried.

However, this would be like telling the person enslaved to debt: “Oh, well you’re thousands of dollars in debt, so there’s no point in trying to fix it.” It would be like telling the drug addict, “It’s going to be really hard to overcome those cravings, so just keep taking those drugs.” Would anyone consider such advice either good or charitable? Yet this is what the liberals would suggest the Church do in the case of divorced and remarried people. Liberals are telling these poor fallen away Catholics that they can ignore the sure medicine of the Gospel to do the seemingly easier thing, which is to wallow in their disorders. This is folly of the highest degree. “Woe to you that call evil good, and good evil: that put darkness for light, and light for darkness: that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter” (Isaias 5. 20).

The liberal solution would be like telling our politicians to go about business as usual and ignore the monstrous debt they have incurred over the years. It isn’t a solution at all, but rather sloth that precedes utter failure. However, we have a tendency to apply common sense to things like economics or personal finance, but common sense seems to go out the window in matters of religion or the salvation of souls. For those facing the obstacle of divorce and remarriage they are convinced by the liberal argument because it is, indeed, easier. They can avoid the hard road of true reform. As a consequence, they end up getting angry with the Church, which despite all the liberal arguments will never change her teaching on this. Not only are they led away from the true medicine, but to their destruction they are induced to hate the teachings of the Catholic Church. Deviating from the path of righteousness by listening to the specious arguments of the misguided liberal establishment leaves the fallen away Catholic worse off in the end.

If Jesus is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, how can deviating from the course He sets out bring the stability or happiness for which the dissatisfied fallen away Catholic longs? Instead of half measures, what is required is a real determination to make things right, and that means to do what needs to be done to achieve one’s salvation. If people are willing to go to extraordinary lengths to free themselves from debt and to set their personal finances on the straight narrow, how much more should they go to extraordinary lengths, no matter how painful, to set right their relationship with God? This could very well mean re-evaluating one’s current relationships that have been caused by divorce and remarriage, and even making radical adjustments. This will mean turning things upside down, and it could very well mean causing, in the short term, hurt feelings, loneliness and other emotional trauma. These sacrifices though will achieve the stability and happiness missing in the life of the dissatisfied fallen away Catholic, and ultimately eternal salvation in the long run.

There is one thing that we can know for sure, and that is no obstacle is really insurmountable because we have grace from God. We know from our holy religion that the Holy Ghost influences our lives by enlightening the mind and strengthening the will, and this we call actual grace. We also know that these graces are sufficient to overcome any and every struggle. However, man must cooperate. Actual graces are obtained by the performance of good works, especially prayer, fasting and almsdeeds. The best way of obtaining actual grace is by devoutly hearing the Holy Mass and worthily receiving Holy Communion and practicing frequent Confession if one is properly disposed. Even when graces are received, God requires, because of our free will, our free response. The first actual grace could be a holy inclination, that if responded to with enthusiasm leads to a string of more graces that gives us the strength to pursue and then accomplish what one had been inspired to pursue.

For example, a common obstacle often confronted by modern men and women is having been mutilated by voluntary surgical sterilization prior to converting to the Catholic faith or while being away from the Church. True contrition for this past sin necessarily entails desiring to make amends. A good Catholic couple who faces this obstacle prays, fasts and gives alms; she and her husband devoutly hears the Mass, receives the sacraments of the Church devoutly, and they are given a holy inspiration, by grace, to reverse the surgical sterilization and do away with this disorder that is a carryover from their former lives. However, this inspiration is met with many obstacles, such as finding the money to finance the procedure and poor physical health. Nonetheless, they resolve to start putting aside a little money every week and to get into better shape. Their response to this initial grace leads to a string of even more actual graces. They grow in their love for each other and the children they already have; they start exercising and making better dietary choices; they stop taking little things for granted; their financial situation improves, and the husband finds a better job that will allow him to put money into a flexible spending account, allowing them pay off the remaining fee for the surgery. Eventually they are granted the very special grace of a new born child. This child means so much to them especially since they had to overcome such great obstacles to bring this new and precious baby into their lives.

This is but one example of something that happens all the time for traditional Catholics who heed the call of grace. These victories are made sweet by the fact that so much had to be overcome, and they give consolation because they demonstrate how intimately the Holy Ghost works in the lives of God’s children. The obstacles that we overcome in our lives are only limited by how much grace we choose to accept or reject. This is not to say that everything we want we will get. Not all desires, even good desires, are holy inspirations, so we should always qualify our prayers by asking that God’s will be done, and not our own. At times God wishes to prove us by suffering, and we ought to rejoice in the opportunity. However, the basic principle is still at work. We have to cooperate with grace, and this cooperation constitutes real effort on our part, to make the changes in our lives that will bring us true happiness, and if we do, God will provide even more of the necessary graces to achieve these changes.

The downgrade of the United States’ sovereign credit rating is a clarion call for real reform. It ought to also, by analogy, be a clarion call for those that are currently away from the Church for one reason or another to reform their lives and their relationship with God. The road ahead is fraught, no doubt, with pain and suffering, but by God’s grace you can hope with confidence for a bright and better future.

It starts with prayer, and the counsel of a good traditional Catholic priest. Please start your journey right now. Don’t wait another day to start to set your house in order.

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Dr. Thomas Pink weighs in on the Tradtitionalist debate

Dr. Thomas Pink, Professor of Philosophy at King's College, London, drills deeper into the religious liberty question, one aspect among many that has been highlighted in the Traditionalist debate, hosted online by Sandro Magister and The Remnant Newpaper. (A synopsis of the debate and links can be found here.)

Please read Dr. Pink's essay at Rorate Cæli at this link. His treatise is in direct response to Fr. Martin Rhonheimer's essay in Nova et Vetera.

Dr. Pink's fascinating treatment of the question of religious liberty hinges on the realization that the Church's right to guide and coerce in matters of religion is de fide due to the nature of baptism. Thus, the issue needs be treated from the perspective of a theology of baptism, rather than from emphasizing the Church's social teachings about the state.

Dr. Pink highlights that the authority to coerce in matters of faith belong by right to the Church, not the state, and that if the state is involved in coercion in regards to religion, it does so legitimately only as a state governed and made up of the baptized and only in service to the Church, per the obligations of baptism. This in turn is dependent upon the Church's policies that have been proven to change given the different historical circumstances she has found herself.

Dignitatis humanae, Dr. Pink asserts, did not change the teaching that the Church has authority to coerce in matters of religion, but rather side-stepped the issue entirely to highlight that the Church has never taught that the state has a native authority to coerce in matters of religion.