It's time to calm down. Apparently many people were expecting a resolution to the canonical situation of the Society of St. Pius X today. However, that didn't happen, nor could it. It was unrealistic to think that it would.
In fact, nothing has changed at all, other than the fact that exactly what was announced happened just as it was announced. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith discussed Bishop Fellay's latest response, provided some observations from the individual members, and then handed the SSPX dossier on to Pope Benedict XVI for his judgment. This is a good thing. This means that the process is going forward as scheduled. Nothing, it seems, is impeding that process.
Since so many people apparently have some misguided expectations, it might be a good idea to consider, realistically, what will probably happen in the coming days. Pope Benedict XVI will review the dossier and either accept Bishop Fellay's response as adequate, or have Cardinal Levada once again meet with Fellay to discuss what the Holy Father does not deem adequate in the response. That has already happened, back in April, and it wasn't the end of the world then, nor will it be the end of world if it should happen again.
If the response is deemed adequate by the Holy Father, as many rumors suggest it will be, then the Holy Father will move to the next step, and that is discussing and formulating the canonical structure for the SSPX. I would imagine the Society's General Council and the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei will have to take the lion's share of the burden in this regard, and that will probably take a few months. Then, of course, the Holy Father will have to review and approve, which will take even more time.
What I'm getting at, is that we have a long way to go. We all want to have a sudden resolution with instant canonical solutions. I suspect, from the comments I've seen around the web, that this is so because a lot people, of various ideological perspectives, want to "spike the football". That way of thinking needs to be removed, because the resolution isn't going to come with a bang, but with a long sigh over time, and that for the divine purpose of instilling a good dose of humility where it is apparently in great need. Pride is making too many people impatient, and inflating the egos of many who ought to know better.
Here's what we know with certainty, and all of them are good:
1. The Holy Father wants this process to proceed, and end with the regularization of the Society. This isn't conjecture, but a plain fact stated by Bishop Fellay, himself. In fact, Bishop Fellay stated that if there is regularization, it will happen because it is the resolute will of the Holy Father.
2. Bishop Fellay believes it will happen soon. He has said as much. He has also called for an extraordinary General Chapter for the end of July. This last piece of information gives us an idea of the time frame we can expect. That General Chapter will probably mark the beginning of discussion concerning the canonical structure for the Society.
3. The other three bishops, whose private correspondence was immorally leaked on internet, may cause difficulties, but only for themselves. The CDF stated today that they will be treated separately from the rest of the SSPX and individually. Despite what some inside and outside the Society are saying, I think this will prove a great benefit. What they say or do from now on will not affect the Holy See's dealings with the Society. While I'm sure that two of the three will work out agreements (and perhaps even the other one), even if they can't or are unwilling to do so, this will not have a deleterious backlash for the rest of the Society.
4. This all is in the hands of God, and is intrusted to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. And we all know that God, the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, loves the Traditional Latin Mass and traditional Catholicism! We also know with the highest confidence that the Blessed Virgin Mary, Saint Joseph, all the saints in heaven, as well as all the angels and archangels, they all love Traditional Catholicism!
What, then, are we worried about?
Please keep up the prayers and sacrifices for this intention, and, please, take a step back, take a deep breath, and be of good cheer.
Thankyou David for this good dose of sanity!
ReplyDeleteSame here. Thank you! God bless!
ReplyDeleteFriday, May 18, 2012
ReplyDeleteBEFORE MEETING THE THREE SSPX BISHOPS CDF NEEDS TO BE ASKED TO ENDORSE AD GENTES 7 WITH RESPECT TO JUDAISM AND CLARIFY THAT INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE (LG 16) IS NOT AN EXPLICIT,KNOWN EXCEPTION TO AG 7 AND THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
What is the moral authority of the pope and cardinals over the three SSPX bishops when they are in public heresy?
If the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) cannot affirm Vatican Council II (AG 7) with respect to Jews and ecumenism, and if they do not admit that invincible ignorance and being saved with a good conscience (LG 16) are not explicit exceptions, then how can they expect the Society of St. Pius X bishops to accept Vatican Council II, and that too, their version of Vatican Council II with no supportive texts from the Council?
The SSPX bishops could insist that the CDF relationship with the Jews should be based on Vatican Council II and that they should be able to cite texts from Vatican Council which says Jews do not have to convert in the present times or that Jews are the Chosen People of God today. There is no such text in Nostra Aetate or Lumen Gentium with reference to the Jews.
Nostra Aetate also does not say that for good relations with the Jews Catholics must deny the Faith.
-Lionel Andrades
________________________________
Thursday, May 17, 2012
CARDINAL KOCH MOUTHS HERESY AT THE ANGELICUM UNIVERSITY: THROWS AWAY VATICAN COUNCIL II, BIBLE AND DOGMA
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/05/cardinal-koch-mouths-heresy-at.html
Pope Benedict XVI has rejected Vatican Council II (AG 7) in Light of the World p.107: Also Cardinals Bertone, Bagnasco, Koch and Ladaria. Yet three SSPX bishops could be excommunicated for only ‘saying’ they reject the Council
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/05/pope-benedict-xvi-has-rejected-vatican.html#links
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
CONFUSED CDF MEETS TODAY
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/05/confused-cdf-meets-today.html#links
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
CATHOLICS COULD CONDUCT AN EDUCATION CAMPAIGN OUTSIDE GERMAN EMBASSIES SAYING : ‘Don’t tell us how to interpret Vatican Council II.Neither tells us our faith and what we should believe in !’
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/05/catholics-could-conduct-education.html
ARCHBISHOP MARCEL LEFEBVRE ACKNOWLEDGED INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE AND IMPLICIT DESIRE BUT DID NOT SAY THAT THEY WERE EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA: IT IS THE SSPX BISHOPS AND PRIESTS WHO ASSUME IT IS
ReplyDeleteIn two quotations on this subject Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre the founder of the Society of St.Pius X has said ‘I repeat, it is possible for someone to be saved in these religions, but they are saved by the Church, and so the formulation is true: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus. This must be preached.” [Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Against the Heresies, pp. 217-218] Elsewhere he has said that there could be people in other religions saved with implicit desire.
He has not said that these cases are known to us and so they are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
It is the SSPX bishops and priests who assume that they are. They assume that implicit desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are explicitly known in the present time.
The Archbishop did not say this.
If only the SSPX bishops could see it!
1. Implicit desire etc is not an exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
2. The Archbishop did not say it was.
3. If the SSPX bishops can realize this then LG 16 is not an exception to the literal ‘formulation’ of extra ecclesiam nulla salus which ‘must be preached’.
4. Then Vatican Council II (AG 7) supports their position on ecumenism and other religions.
5. Then can tell their Jewish critics that :
“We accept Vatican Council II and it says Jews need to convert for salvation while invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) are not explicit exceptions to the dogma or AG 7.
'So if you say before entering the Catholic Church we should accept Vatican Council II we accept the Council knowing that invincible ignorance etc are not known to us. We reject your interpretation of Vatican Council in which you irrationally assume that invincible ignorance etc are explicit and known to us in the present time and so they are an exception to the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and also to Vatican Council (AG 7) and are position on ecumenism and other religions.'
-Lionel Andrades